Experience

Mazurek-8592-bw-214x300Mr. Mazurek has achieved favorable settlements for clients in various matters. But sometimes, it is necessary to go all the way to vindicate a client’s interests. Below is a list of just some of the matters that Mr. Mazurek has taken all the way and obtained formal adjudications.

  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma — Represented client in federal lawsuit for racial harassment and race discrimination – jury trial – obtained unanimous jury verdict for client on all claims – no appeal.
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania –
  • Represented clients in federal lawsuit involving sexual hostile environment and sex discrimination — jury trial — jury rendered unanimous verdict for each client on all claims — no appeal.

    • Superior Court of Hennepin County, Minnesota – Represented clients in case involving personal injury claims and claims of racial and sexual harassment, racially discriminatory and retaliatory discharge – jury and bench trial – jury rendered a unanimous verdict in clients’ favor on all counts, and court accepted jury’s advisory verdict on statutory claims and awarded clients attorneys fees and costs – no appeal.
    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Represented client in federal age discrimination lawsuit — jury trial — jury verdict for client on all claims — no appeal.
    • U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, United State Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit — Represented client in class action involving mass layoffs consisting of 400+ plaintiff class members — obtained summary judgment — affirmed on appeal.
    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Represented client in sexual harassment and discriminatory termination claims, and claims for breach of contract and violation of wage payment statute – obtained summary judgment on sexual harassment claims — jury trial on remaining claims – obtained unanimous jury verdict for client on all remaining claims — no appeal.
    • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit –Represented client in federal disability discrimination lawsuit – obtained summary judgment in favor of client – affirmed on appeal.
    • Circuit Court Jefferson County, Kentucky — Represented clients in lawsuit involving claims for personal injury, sex and pregnancy discrimination, and retaliation arising out of RIF – jury trial – obtained directed verdict for clients on personal injury claims, and unanimous jury verdict for each client on remaining claims with costs of suit taxed and payable to client – no appeal.
    • Delaware Chancery Court — Represented clients in breach of contract, tortious interference with contractual relations and misappropriation of trade secrets litigation — bench trial — verdict for clients on all counts — no appeal
    • American Arbitration Association, Chicago, Illinois – Represented client in breach of contract claim involving more than $14,000,000.00 in damages – arbitration – arbitration award granting client’s motion for summary disposition and awarding client all attorneys’ fees and costs.
    • Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida — Represented client in whistleblower, sex discrimination, retaliation, and defamation litigation – obtained summary judgment in client’s favor on all claims.
    • U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota – Represented client in race, national origin, color, and religious discrimination claims – court granted summary judgment in favor of client on all claims.
    • Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County, Ohio, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania – Represented clients in litigation involving misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential information, unfair trade practices, defamation, breach of contract, tortious interference and breach of duty of loyalty. On the eve of our filing summary judgment motion, obtained total relief sought through settlement.
    • U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania — Represented client in breach of contract action – obtained summary judgment in client’s favor an all claims – no appeal.
    • New Hampshire Dept. of Labor — Represented client in whistleblower claim – bench trial – obtained ruling totally in client’s favor – no appeal.
    • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, National Labor Relations Board, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit – Represented client in NLRA Section 10(j) injunction proceeding — bench trial — court denied injunction sought by NLRB seeking reinstitution of bargaining unit; defended client in hearing and appeal before NLRB — client prevailed on appeal before Second Circuit on refusal to bargain charge.
    • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio — Represented client in federal lawsuit involving state common law claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel and personal injury — obtained summary judgment in client’s favor on all counts and costs of suit awarded to client.
    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan — Represented client in federal lawsuit involving age discrimination and state tort claims — obtained judgment in favor of client on all claims.
    • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York — Represented client in federal lawsuit involving common law wrongful discharge and statutory whistleblower claims — obtained summary judgment in client’s favor on all counts — appeal dismissed.
    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Represented client in federal lawsuit involving COBRA, ERISA, and state common law – obtained judgment in favor of client on all counts.
    • U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York — Represented client in federal lawsuit involving claims for benefits under severance plan – obtained judgment in favor of client on all counts.
    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania – Represented client in federal lawsuit involving claims for stock options under option plans and agreements — obtained summary judgment in client’s favor with all counts dismissed with prejudice — no appeal.
    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — Commenced action on behalf of client against the United States Department of Labor and OSHA for violation of client’s procedural due process rights under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution — case withdrawn after DOL agreed not to take action which would have resulted in due process deprivation.
    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit – Represented client in federal lawsuit involving Title VII retaliation claims — obtained summary judgment in client’s favor on all counts — affirmed on appeal — costs taxed in favor of client.
    • Chester County, Pa. Common Pleas Court – Represented clients in lawsuit involving claims for wrongful discharge, false light invasion of privacy, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and civil conspiracy — court ruled in clients’ favor on all claims — no appeal.
    • Philadelphia County, Pa. Common Pleas Court, Pennsylvania Superior Court, Pennsylvania Supreme Court — Represented client in case involving claims for tortious interference with contractual relations and civil conspiracy — court ruled in client’s favor on all claims — Superior Court affirmed ruling after oral argument — affirmed by Pa. Supreme Court.
    • Luzerne County, Pa. Common Pleas Court — Represented client in sex and age discrimination case — obtained summary judgment in client’s favor on all counts — Superior Court affirmed on appeal after oral argument.

    Privacy Policy
    © Copyright 2009 mazureklawfirm.com All Rights Reserved